Which factor is NOT part of the Dunn factors for determining reasonable expectation of privacy?

The Dunn factors for determining reasonable expectation of privacy originate from the Supreme Court case California v. Ciraolo and Florida v. Riley. These factors are used to evaluate whether an individual has a legitimate expectation of privacy in a particular area. The factors include the proximity to the home, the use of the area, and the steps taken to protect against observation.

Ownership history is not considered a factor in determining reasonable expectation of privacy according to the Dunn factors. Instead, the core aspects focus on how the space is used, how close it is to the personal residence, and what measures, if any, have been taken to shield the area from public view or observation.

In essence, the expectation of privacy is rooted in the physical use and control of the space rather than historical ownership. This understanding is crucial when assessing privacy rights under the Fourth Amendment, as it outlines the standards by which courts evaluate an individual’s expectation of privacy.